Litigo drafts motions, analyzes depositions, runs jurisdiction-tuned research, and predicts case outcomes — with a citation on every claim and a human-in-the-loop on every consequential action.
In design-partner deployment at
Associates bill $300–$700 an hour for work that is, in honest moments, mechanical: digesting depositions, locating controlling authority, marking up first drafts, building exhibit lists. Harvey serves BigLaw transactional. Litigo serves the litigation floor — the 100,000 mid-size firms underserved by every generation of legal software.
We are not a chat window beside Westlaw. Litigo is a system of record and a system of action: the docket, the discovery, the depositions and the agents that work them — under one workspace, with an audit trail your malpractice carrier will read happily.
Litigo writes in your firm's voice, cites controlling authority for the venue, and flags every claim a partner should pressure-test before filing.
Drop a 400-page transcript. Get a partner-grade summary, witness contradiction map, and Q&A pack for the next deposition before lunch.
Trained against millions of state and federal dockets — not just headnotes.
Settlement bands and motion-grant probabilities, modelled on similar matters before this judge.
Review millions of documents with privilege calls a reviewer can stand behind.
Five agents, each with a narrow job and a paper trail. You approve every step that matters.
Reads the matter, drafts the issue list and outline.
Pulls controlling authority for the jurisdiction and judge.
Drafts in the firm's voice and chosen style guide.
Independently checks every citation, every quote, every claim.
Reviews, redlines, files. The record is signed.
Every matter has its agents, its evidence, its citations, and its audit trail in one place. No more emailing PDFs around at 11pm.
"We stopped staffing first drafts. Litigo writes them; a senior associate edits them. Partner time goes to the argument, not the prose."
| Litigo | Westlaw + ChatGPT | Harvey | Legacy DMS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Litigation, end-to-end | Research + chat | BigLaw transactional | Document storage |
| Drafts motions in firm voice | ✓ | — | Partial | — |
| Jurisdiction-tuned models | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Cite-checked by independent verifier | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Outcome prediction on similar dockets | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Audit trail per agent action | ✓ | — | Partial | — |
| SOC 2 · SSO · RBAC · DPA | ✓ | Varies | ✓ | ✓ |
If yours isn't here, our team will answer it on a 30-minute call.
Talk to us →No. By default, your matter data is never used to train base or specialist models. Opt-in fine-tuning is available with explicit, contractual consent and isolated training pipelines.
An independent verifier agent checks every citation against the cited source — pin-citations, holdings, and quoted text — before any output reaches you. Unverifiable claims are flagged, not silently dropped.
All US federal districts and all 50 state courts on day one. UK and EU specialist models are on the roadmap for 2026.
Litigo is structured to comply with ABA Formal Opinion 512 and the disclosure regimes adopted by leading state bars. Every agent action is logged and exportable as a disclosure record.
Annual subscription per firm, scaled to seats and matter volume, with optional usage-based credits for high-volume workflows. See pricing.
A 30-minute demo on your own matter. Walk out with a drafted motion.